Upon the Midnight


+ What you'll find here...

• Fandom
• Activism
• Filmmaking
• My fanfiction
• History, esp. age of sail
• Fantasy
• Steampunk
• Dance
• Fashion
• Tea
• Sometimes nsfw

Check the left sidebar links for more info.

hobbitballerina:

hagakures-burger:

bennybones-cumbercheeks:

lordoftheinternet:

poptech:

And the highest paid public employee in your state is…

are you fucking kidding me

Do you ever just see America’s priorities and cry?



Yeah, when I was at the University of Iowa, they were paying their football coach $2.35 million a year.  (That’s not including other income from endorsement deals, either, which I think bring him up towards the $4 million range, if I recall correctly.)  But us graduate students had to pay for office supplies and copier paper, because the school budget was maxed out putting a new roof on the football stadium.  So they shut down some departments, downsized a bunch of others (including my own), got rid of some tenured professorial chairs and … upped Coach Ferentz’s salary to $2.7 million a year.
And for the record?  The UI’s football team that year was only one of seven football programs in the NCAA that was financially solvent.  Why, you ask?  Because the college and to a large extent, the state of Iowa, subsidized them.  Iowan tax dollars paid for the football team — but not for the paper, paper clips, pens, and blue books that undergraduates needed for us TAs to actually teach them.
I’m sure Coach Ferentz is a nice guy and works hard.  I know football is huge out in Hawkeye territory.  I come from football territory myself, and I still watch the games when I’m home with my dad.  The UI was the only school I ever went to that had a recognizable football program of any kind, and Dad likes football.  I like football.  But I don’t understand why the University of Iowa pumped millions of dollars into the football program, turned an ostensible $27 million profit, and instead of investing that back into the school, they slashed programs and raised the football coach’s salary.
It’s almost like it’s a vaguely inconvenient university attached to an occasionally-successful college football team.  Like students are there to pump money into athletics with their tuition instead of, I don’t know, learn something.
I know, I know, rah rah rah, go Hawkeyes, stop complaining, football is so important, more important than graduate programs in education, linguistics, Asian studies, American studies, German, comparative literature, and other critical offerings in the humanities.  It’s not like it’s the only university in the state system that offers those things … oh wait, yes it is.  To say nothing of faculty who left or were forced out of departments to make ends meet and avoid ending up before the budget committee.  FOOTBALL.

hobbitballerina:

hagakures-burger:

bennybones-cumbercheeks:

lordoftheinternet:

poptech:

And the highest paid public employee in your state is…

are you fucking kidding me

Do you ever just see America’s priorities and cry?

Yeah, when I was at the University of Iowa, they were paying their football coach $2.35 million a year.  (That’s not including other income from endorsement deals, either, which I think bring him up towards the $4 million range, if I recall correctly.)  But us graduate students had to pay for office supplies and copier paper, because the school budget was maxed out putting a new roof on the football stadium.  So they shut down some departments, downsized a bunch of others (including my own), got rid of some tenured professorial chairs and … upped Coach Ferentz’s salary to $2.7 million a year.

And for the record?  The UI’s football team that year was only one of seven football programs in the NCAA that was financially solvent.  Why, you ask?  Because the college and to a large extent, the state of Iowa, subsidized them.  Iowan tax dollars paid for the football team — but not for the paper, paper clips, pens, and blue books that undergraduates needed for us TAs to actually teach them.

I’m sure Coach Ferentz is a nice guy and works hard.  I know football is huge out in Hawkeye territory.  I come from football territory myself, and I still watch the games when I’m home with my dad.  The UI was the only school I ever went to that had a recognizable football program of any kind, and Dad likes football.  I like football.  But I don’t understand why the University of Iowa pumped millions of dollars into the football program, turned an ostensible $27 million profit, and instead of investing that back into the school, they slashed programs and raised the football coach’s salary.

It’s almost like it’s a vaguely inconvenient university attached to an occasionally-successful college football team.  Like students are there to pump money into athletics with their tuition instead of, I don’t know, learn something.

I know, I know, rah rah rah, go Hawkeyes, stop complaining, football is so important, more important than graduate programs in education, linguistics, Asian studies, American studies, German, comparative literature, and other critical offerings in the humanities.  It’s not like it’s the only university in the state system that offers those things … oh wait, yes it is.  To say nothing of faculty who left or were forced out of departments to make ends meet and avoid ending up before the budget committee.  FOOTBALL.


So I’m a new-ish Paul McGann fan…

I’ve seen Hornblower, Doctor Who, and [edit: I forgot, also some of Luther]… What do I watch next? And where can I find it?

posted 4 hours ago with 2 notes

Name a fictional character you think I’d make good friends with

vantasarcastic:

bonus points for explaining


timballisto asked: "I'm writing a paper about the internalized racism in Shakespeare's Othello. Do you have any good sources about the Elizabethan interactions with people of color that can give me some context for this play? I asked my professor but he gave me the "there were no african peoples (Moors or otherwise) in England in this time period" spiel, but I'm sensing bullshit. Thank you!"

medievalpoc:

Uhhhhh.

Okay well your professor lied to you.

Actually there were so many Black British at that time that Elizabeth I tried to blame the realms ills on them and have them all deported. Twice. She failed, probably because you can’t deport your own citizens very well under most circumstances. It’s actually a pretty pivotal point in English history.

Here’s one of the letters from her own hand:

image

[transcript]

An open le[tt]re to the L[ord] Maiour of London and th’alermen his brethren, And to all other Maiours, Sheryfes, &c. Her Ma[jes]tieunderstanding that there are of late divers Blackmoores brought into the Realme, of which kinde of people there are all ready here to manie,consideringe howe God hath blessed this land w[i]th great increase of people of our owne Nation as anie Countrie in the world, wherof manie for want of Service and meanes to sett them on worck fall to Idlenesse and to great extremytie; Her Ma[jesty’]s pleasure therefore ys, that those kinde of people should be sent forthe of the lande. And for that purpose there ys direction given to this bearer Edwarde Banes to take of those Blackmoores that in this last voyage under Sir Thomas Baskervile, were brought into this Realme to the nomber of Tenn, to be Transported by him out of the Realme. Wherein wee Req[uire] you to be aydinge & Assysting unto him as he shall have occacion, and thereof not to faile.

You can read another one in its entirety here.

Elizabeth I tried to use Black British as scapegoats for some of the problems in English society during the Elizabethan Era, problems that led to the passing of the famous Poor Laws in 1597 and 1601.

From The British National Archives:

But while Elizabeth may have enjoyed being entertained by Black people, in the 1590s she also issued proclamations against them. In 1596 she wrote to the lord mayors of major cities noting that there were ‘of late divers blackmoores brought into this realm, of which kind of people there are already here to manie…’. She ordered that ‘those kinde of people should be sente forth of the land’.

Elizabeth made an arrangement for a merchant, Casper van Senden, to deport Black people from England in 1596. The aim seems to have been to exchange them for (or perhaps to sell them to obtain funds to buy) English prisoners held by England’s Catholic enemies Spain and Portugal.

No doubt van Senden intended to sell these people. But this was not to be, because masters* of Black workers - who had not been offered compensation - refused to let them go. In 1601, Elizabeth issued a further proclamation expressing her ‘discontentment by the numbers of blackamores which are crept into this realm…’ and again licensing van Senden to deport Black people. It is doubtful whether this second proclamation was any more successful than the first.

Why this sudden, urgent desire to expel members of England’s Black population? It was more than a commercial transaction pursued by the queen. In the 16th century, the ruling classes became increasingly concerned about poverty and vagrancy, as the feudal system- which, in theory, had kept everyone in their place - finally broke down. They feared disorder and social breakdown and, blaming the poor, brought in poor laws to try to deal with the problem

As you can see, Black people were a pretty important and pivotal part of English society at the time. Basically, the Queen tried to convince the people that they had to “give up” their cobbler’s apprentices and weavers and other various other workingpeople (the Black musicians in the court were of course exempt from the deportations) to the crown, on the basis that they were “vagrants” and “mostly infidels”. This was not only a wild exaggeration (most were Christian with working class jobs like ya do), but it’s not a very compelling reason to frigging report your next-door neighbor Bill the Mason to immigration. Because then who’s going to do your masonry?

So anyways, the Poor Laws had to be passed, because you can’t deport your citizens/workforce and no one would cooperate with something like that.

And it’s not like those people went anywhere. They’re still there. They were there before that! Some had been there since like, the 4th frigging century when that was part of the Roman Empire!

Also check the tag for England here. Plenty more on lots of different people of color in England throughout many eras.

* this generally refers to the “master” of a workshop or guildmaster, not necessarily the master of an enslaved person, FYI.


theballetblog:

Konstantin Razumov, Russian  (1860—1939).

theballetblog:

Konstantin Razumov, Russian  (1860—1939).




Favorite Hornblower Screencaps (108/?)——> Mutiny

Favorite Hornblower Screencaps (108/?)
——> Mutiny

posted 1 day ago via guardevoir with 2 notes


“…I have had such a sickening of men in masses, and of causes, that I would not cross this room to reform parliament or prevent the union or to bring about the millennium. I speak only for myself, mind - it is my own truth alone - but man as part of a movement or a crowd is indifferent to me. He is inhuman. And I have nothing to do with nations, or nationalism. The only feelings I have - for what they are - are for men as individuals; my loyalties, such as they may be, are to private persons alone.”

Private persons like Jack Aubrey, for instance.

“…I have had such a sickening of men in masses, and of causes, that I would not cross this room to reform parliament or prevent the union or to bring about the millennium. I speak only for myself, mind - it is my own truth alone - but man as part of a movement or a crowd is indifferent to me. He is inhuman. And I have nothing to do with nations, or nationalism. The only feelings I have - for what they are - are for men as individuals; my loyalties, such as they may be, are to private persons alone.”

Private persons like Jack Aubrey, for instance.


thenatashanetwork:

Rules and Conditions
No need to follow anyone.
Re blogging or liking will not affect your chances, but we would appreciate a reblog to help spread the word
What we are looking for
blogs that love our favorite russian assassin. 
active members
That’s it: check out our manifesto to see more of what we are about
How to Join
fill out this short questionnaire.
Everyone is accepted to be included on our members wall
We will accept the first ten members as they apply, and then in five member batches as slots fill up. 
Info
We will accept everybody
You can track the tag #thenatashanetwork
No obligation to link to us, but once again, feel free to spread the word
You would get to:

meet new friends with similar interests


access to things like fic recs, photoshop help, comics links, discussions, meta, and more


promos

have a spot on the network page

etc.

thenatashanetwork:

Rules and Conditions
  • No need to follow anyone.
  • Re blogging or liking will not affect your chances, but we would appreciate a reblog to help spread the word
What we are looking for
How to Join
  • fill out this short questionnaire.
  • Everyone is accepted to be included on our members wall
  • We will accept the first ten members as they apply, and then in five member batches as slots fill up. 
Info
  • We will accept everybody
  • You can track the tag #thenatashanetwork
  • No obligation to link to us, but once again, feel free to spread the word
You would get to:
  • meet new friends with similar interests

  • access to things like fic recs, photoshop help, comics links, discussions, meta, and more

  • promos

  • have a spot on the network page
  • etc.


tom-nippleston:

Ok so here’s the rules:

  • Reblog and Like this post to enter into the Giveaway. You do NOT have to be following me, but it would be fucking rad if you did.
  • Must have your Ask Box OPEN and be willing to send me your address
  • If you don’t respond to claim your prize within…